The sound proofing in this block of flats is non existent. I thought I was impervious to this kind of thing, but I found myself blushing at the sound of next door's "night noises". It's a bit of a noisy place here anyway, though (no, not in
that way!). We live on Mile Lane, but I dub it "Garbage Collection Lane", because at any hour you can hear the "erhn erhn erhn"..."kaardoonk" of the Garbage trucks. Despite this, I often step outside to discover all the garbage bins overflowing. Tracey thinks the Garbage trucks just drive up and down the lane for the sole purpose of annoying her at night.
People predicted that Tracey and I wouldn't work as flatmates. How wrong they were. There's never a dull moment, and life seems richer when you're around people who bring issues and thoughts out into the open, and then maybe make a joke about it. For example, the other day I fell up the stairs.
Tracey asked, "Are you okay?"
"Yempf" I reply.
"But is your ego okay?"
Classic.
The other day I had a filling. It hurt when they were putting it in. Yesterday I had another filling and this time I asked them to give me more anesthetic/numbing stuff. The dentist overcompensated so when I came home Amy and Tracey laughed at me because I looked like a celebrity collegen job gone wrong. My upper lip is still a bit swollen, so I'll just be bit sexier for a bit. ;)
Yesterday, in the Christian Philosophy reading group, I got to say, in the hearing of the Spongian, that if the body of Christ was found I would no longer believe in God. He didn't respond, but I'd love to know what he was thinking. I made that remark in the context of a question Jason asked. Is it possible for science to disproove the existence of God? I think that this is a very good question when not taken lightly. There is a sense in which the question presupposes a catagory error; that is, that God is of the metaphysical kind accesible to science. However, God is not physical, and cannot be described by science in the way that bugs can, or that my frontal lobe can be so described. (I have probably made quite a few assumptions about the nature of science, my viewers can contest them, if they so wish)
However, the proofs for the existence of God are not all metaphysical in nature. I think that in the arenas of Chance/Determinism and Evolution/Astrophysics, God cannot be disproved, in principle.
In principle, though, could science disprove Christianity by showing that body X belongs to Jesus Christ (a terrifying thought)? Could science show who X is, beyond a doubt? We might say that science is certain,
to an extent, but appeal to Humian scepticism, that is, the probelm of induction. This appeal would allow us to reject scientific claims because they are necessarily founded on induction, and induction is irrational in the end. Thus, we could just deny that X is not Christ's body because science doesn't know what it's talking about.
However, if we were to be sceptical like that about science, in order to be consistent, we have to be sceptical about pretty much all the features of the external world. So we'd have to deny the Bible as well as physical objects. Even though you might have kept Christianity unchallenged, you have to deny it anyway.
So, the solution is to suppose a kind of realism about the external world and science. But the question remains, could science, in principle, disprove God in this way? What do my readers think?